LOVE TO BE NEEDED, OR NEED TO BE LOVED?
By Shari Schreiber,
How often have you heard yourself
say, "I'm a giver, not a taker"? Have you experienced
discomfort when receiving something from another, whether
it's a kind gesture, favor or gift? Do you know what it's like to
be in a reciprocal relationship?
If these questions are triggering familiar sensations, it means
you started learning this inclination in childhood, and were made
to feel that receiving supplies of attention, affection and emotional
support came at a substantial cost to your parent(s). As a natural
outcome of this, you began putting the needs of others far ahead
of your own, because doing otherwise meant punishment,
guilt and/or shame.
You might identify yourself
as a 'rescuer type' personality. You weren't born with this trait.
It was cultivated in you from an early age, and it's directly due
to environmental influences.
Were you raised in a home
where everything you did was closely monitored or controlled? Did
you grow up feeling as if you had to be perfect, to please your
mother or father? What was the cost to you, if you (God forbid)
ever failed to behave perfectly? Might you have feared the loss
of their affection, approval or love?
you read through this material, you might experience sudden sleepiness
or perhaps a little sadness. This is a somatic
response, which means that a facet of you is identifying with various
elements being discussed here--and they have important
meaning for you. While you may decide to take a short break,
rest assured that there is nothing to fear from these uncomfortable
sensations, and I encourage you to continue. You'll get the most
value from this information, if you return to the hyperlinks
that take you to other pages after you've finished reading
A fairly large number of clients
have reported that throughout their life, their mother commented
on what a 'good baby' they'd been; "you never cried" is
what they've repeatedly been told growing up. All babies have substantial
needs, and they cry to alert their parent to what's required
concerning food, diapering, holding/comforting, warmth, etc. If
the baby never cries, we must ask why.
Did it feel unsafe to express these vital needs? Did we sense we
might not survive, if we inconvenienced our mother by having
any needs? As this child grows, will he presume his utter silence
and refusal to have needs, is an admirable and good thing?
None of us grew up being perfectly
parented--in fact it's virtually impossible to anticipate that this
could even happen. Alas, we are all products of our experiences,
which have impacted us to one degree or another, and that's what
this piece attempts to address. There will likely be parts of this
article that you'll relate to, and other parts you won't--but if
any of this material opens a doorway to greater self-awareness,
healing might begin for you and your child, parent or spouse, and
that's my objective.
is extraordinarily dense with meaning, and must
be absorbed very slowly, to help you understand why your love affairs
haven't worked out the way you've wanted them to. It's best that
you read no more than three paragraphs per day--then ask yourself;
what's this segment trying to teach me about myself? so
that you can learn, and actually benefit from it. With every review
of this piece, you will gain greater understanding, and integrate
even more of it~ so why stop with only one reading?
When you're a self-proclaimed
"giver," it's very likely you've been raised in a home
where certain needs were not acknowledged or adequately responded
to, and you've compensated for this deficit, by becoming
a caregiver. Even if you felt like your parents
were overburdened in some way, you might have tried to become an
invisible child, so as not to place more demand on them,
or incur painful repercussion.
Perhaps you had a parent who
always put the needs of a spouse, neighbor or friend ahead of their
own (and yours) and as this was the example set for you, it's what
you've emulated. It's just what 'good people' do~ or so you've been
As a young kid, you may have
discovered that taking care of another's needs provided vicarious
satisfaction, and a sense of safety, empowerment or self-worth.
Whether you've promoted another's dependency on you emotionally,
physically or financially as an adult, feeling needed has
fortified your self-esteem, but it's also eased abandonment
concerns, which is the real basis for these relational
AS THE TWIG IS BENT,
SO GROWS THE TREE.
to one's sense of Self during infancy and early childhood, are often
referred to as core damage/trauma or narcissistic
injury, within the body of this text. In simple terms, having core
issues means that the 'hub' of your wheel has been broken or damaged
in some manner. When the very center of your being is compromised,
all the spokes which emanate from that point will be weak, and susceptible
to breaking under any amount of strain. Core trauma impacts every
aspect of our existence, as it shapes self-worth, and influences
how we think about and take care of ourselves, in personal and professional
core damaged child might ask his mom or dad, "do you love me?"
The parent's response may be, "of course I do, you're my
kid!" but a child who's looking for confirmation
that he is loved, is one who cannot actually feel or believe that
he is! This child typically goes through life feeling dependent
on constant validation from others, because he's lacked the parental
supplies of affection and praise, from which he would have learned
core trauma results from poor or inadequate parenting from as early
as infancy, this wounding inevitably causes relationship struggles
in adulthood. Unfortunately, no amount of insight on this topic
can mend core issues, for what's needed is solid reparenting to
replace the faulty original template we grew to accept
as 'normal' during childhood. In truth, this is a relationship
problem, which requires resolution within a corrective,
relational bond. You cannot resolve core wounding without highly
specialized guidance, and a chance to learn/acquire specific self-worth
THE CLONE CONSPIRACY
Narcissism in parents is the
primary cause of psychopathology in our society. The narcissistic
parent wants a child who's exactly like him or her. If
this kid has different personality features and values than the
parent, he's regarded with disappointment and disapproval/disdain
and criticized or punished. It's challenging for any parent
to bond with a child who's unlike him/herself, but the narcissistic
mother or father treats it like a sin, and their 'prodigy' grows
up never feeling good enough, or lovable just for being himself.
This issue is usually passed
along generation to generation, which is why so many talented young
people are urged (often against their will), to echo the parent's
career choice or take over the family business, even if they have
no natural ability in that arena, or passionate desire to follow
a parent's path.
Depression in teens and young
adults typically results from feeling like they can never live up
to a parent's expectations, if they have wishes and dreams that
aren't congruent with Father's or Mother's. Hence, pleasing one's
parent takes precedence over pleasing oneself, and core issues are
the narcissistic parent is insecure. God help the adult child who
surpasses his parent's achievements, for this inspires
malicious competition from the envious parent toward his/her offspring.
This 'clone' issue sets one up for feeling damned if he accomplishes,
and damned if he fails~ which is the root of self-sabotaging behavior
patterns (it's easier to accept a parent's disappointment in our
performance, than to incur his or her resentment if we excel).
PAINFUL INNER CONFLICT OF THE TOO GOOD CHILD
child who's grown up feeling they need to behave perfectly, has
acquired a distored definition of love. Love meant
painful longing and yearning for that which was never gratified.
Thus, this same type of emotional experience is exciting in his/her
adult attachments, for it's interpreted as 'the real deal.'
means, lovers who are capable of reciprocating their love
and affection, are rejected out of hand. It's boring and doesn't
feel like a fit, because this dynamic doesn't trigger the
inner pain that was associated with loving, as a little child.
children grow into needful adults. They might fear that if they
let themselves love somebody as intensely as they want
to, that person will shriek, run off into the night, and abandon
them. Their sense of need feels gigantic, and often painful. It
presumes that someone on the receiving end won't be able to handle
it--which triggers shame for being "so needy."
This shame makes one want to shut-down their needs (or control them),
which is a defense that has one giving to others,
what he/she desperately requires. It also has them choosing emotionally
unavailable partners who reactivate painful sensations that reinforce
their childhood abandonment trauma.
core injured child lives with the tormenting, inescapable question:
"Am I good enough to be loved by you?"
Entitlement issues have to
do with poor self-worth, and our inability to feel deserving/worthy
of receiving what we need and want. Healthy self-esteem means that
we're equally as comfortable 'getting' as giving. Our desperate,
unrelenting quest to gain acceptance and approval from others (so
that we can feel good about ourselves) is central
to compulsive giving, and rescuing or fixing behaviors. A lack of
Self keeps us trying to fill the hole in our soul at
any cost, with unsuitable partners.
'Wounded Bird Syndrome' is
an intricate relationship problem. It involves our subconscious
need to select and remain with somebody who's impaired in some manner,
and isn't likely to leave us for someone better. It's driven by
our deep insecurity, and wish to avert abandonment. This issue is
implanted in early childhood, by a needful parent who required our
comfort or care.
Maybe you grew up with a depressed
mother or father, and you did whatever you could to ease their sadness,
or cheer them up. If that parent eventually became sick and died,
or they committed suicide, you might have grown up feeling
responsible for not having prevented it, and your Savior Complex
are 'easy marks' for individuals with personality disorder features.
Their inability to recognize and honor their own feelings,
instincts and needs leaves them highly susceptible to relationships
that lack reciprocity, which is examined/explained in detail throughout
GRASS ROOTS OF AN INTRICATE, ANCIENT GARDEN
child who experiences deficits in nurturant attention, encouragement,
affection, positive mirroring, etc. from his parent, presumes it's
his/her fault, and experiences shame ("I'm
not good enough/lovable"). This child grows up with the belief
that if he/she tries just a little harder to gain these
parental supplies, they will be forthcoming. Up to a point, this
has them efforting to be perfectly helpful and useful--but it's
not rewarded. The parent may praise an accomplishment--but does
not convey the intrinsic lovability of this child, which reinforces
his ideation that he must 'do,' in order to receive genuine acceptance
and love. Some kids experience performance fatigue, and
give-up trying to get these crucial needs met, but carry the very
same behaviors into their adult associations! Their painful hope
that someone, someday will find them worthy of loving,
has them chasing after it (often, against all odds) in romantic
partnerships. If they manage to find a partner who can initially
mirror their worth, it concretizes that it might not have been their
lack of lovability (with their parents) after all.
The problem with this subconsciously driven need, is that they're
selecting lovers who are cut from the same cloth as the people who
raised them--and the end result is consistent/identical. This of
course, reconstitutes their original shame (from parental
neglect or abuse). The need to escape this horrible feeling, perpetuates
an unrelenting compulsion to get love from partners who are incapable
of supplying it.
issue is exacerbated, when harsh
treatment from one of our parents is not only permitted, but
is sanctioned by the other with; "he/she really
does love you." This is terribly confusing for a small
child, for he/she experiences pain at
the hands of Mom or Dad, but is repeatedly told that "it's
Love." This skewed definition of what love is, taints our perceptions
and sets us up for a lifetime of accepting that anguish in our relationships
is normal, and that hurting's part of loving. Any
parent who has whitewashed abusiveness, has screwed up
their child for life, for he will always lack common sense and distrust
his instincts, unless solid, healing intervention is obtained.
a client tells me they had an "ideal childhood," or that
his/her parents had a perfect, long-term marriage, I know
we've got challenging work ahead. The reality is, if this were true,
they would not be struggling to form healthy attachments--and they
definitely wouldn't be needing my help. Denial keeps us
trapped in self-blame for our failings, instead of putting the blame
where it actually belongs. It also keeps us addicted to
poor relational choices.
may have convinced yourself that your parents "did the best
they could" but if that's so, why are you
having to invest all this time, money and effort in therapy and
a litany of self-help venues, just to feel okay about yourself?
child needs to feel valued by his/her parent. He
needs to see welcome on the parent's face when he enters
a room, and feel like he really matters, and is loved. Very few
of us ever experienced this--in fact, what we consistently saw instead,
were expressions of indifference or annoyance--and this shaped how
we grew up feeling about ourselves!
reality, your parent showed you a distorted reflection
of yourself, and you've trusted it as accurate. (How could
Mom or Dad be wrong??)
we repeatedly feel confusion, disappointment or distress in childhood,
we have to normalize those experiences in order to survive
them. Often, we stow away these difficult feelings or make them
not matter, so we're able to coexist with a variety of upsets--and
the people responsible for them (our parents). The problem is, these
survival strategies remain intact throughout our adulthood,
and prompt serious issues like anxiety disorders, addictions,
compulsive behaviors, attachment fears, impaired partner selection,
feelings are put away in childhood, our emotional growth is stunted.
As we can't help but be drawn to partners who echo our earliest
experiences and match our level of emotional development,
we're naturally attracted to others who are as underdeveloped and
damaged as we--which sets us up for failure in our Love life. These
unions seem familiar and 'normal' to us,
so there's an intoxicating, compelling drive to maintain them. This
element is discussed in greater depth toward the end of this article--but
the rest will help you discern why you've landed here.
always astounded, when I work with clients who have any
trust in God or sense of spirituality, after they've survived horrible
cruelty at the hands of their parents. To a small child, the
parent IS a god--someone
he/she trusts implicitly and automatically, to protect and care
for them. The stories I hear of the pain these people have endured
are heartbreaking, and I'm amazed at their capacity to even approach
A few of my clients have chosen
to share this material with their parent. If You are a parent, and
your grown child has gifted you this article or you've
found it by chance, there's a strong likelihood they're needing
your apology for some childhood issues they've struggled to surmount.
If you're wanting to build a closer bond with him or her, any attempts
to make amends must be heartfelt--and made without
explanations or excuses! The reasons you weren't 'equipped'
to do it differently or better, are of no use in context of easing
the pain they still carry. In short, this effort can't become about
you and your struggles, for while they may have empathy
and understanding for your plight, they're still wrestling with
unresolved wounds and trust issues. Healing is
only possible, when someone you've hurt (even
unwittingly) can feel your sincere remorse. While this
process isn't easy, it can go a long way toward helping you repair
any relationship where trust has been undermined.
CAREGIVER EQUATES BEING NEEDED, WITH BEING LOVED.
Your caregiving nature
is drawn to codependent relationship dynamics with friends or lovers
who are either handicapped, in crisis, emotionally/sexually underdeveloped,
substance addicted or in recovery/rehab. You've unwittingly selected
partners whose self-esteem is flagging, or whom in some way need
rescuing--or extreme amounts of support or nurturing. Quite often,
feelings of boredom or emptiness will prompt phone calls to friends
who allow you to fuel/fix them with 'pep talks' or emotional/psychological
bolstering, and you feel better afterward.
Occasionally, you'll romantically connect with someone who initially
shows promise or "potential," only to be disappointed
and angry at the end of this relationship, having carried the financial
and/or emotional weight for both of you! The subconscious theme
that underlies this pairing process is: "If you
NEED me, you'll never leave me."
In the rare event a selected
lover presents as self-sufficient and non-needy, Caregivers are still
compelled to encourage some level of dependency. This can be demonstrated
by attempts to subtly undermine a partner's confidence in body image,
wardrobe preference, dietary habits, work proficiency, sexual adequacy,
etc. Basically, if there's opportunity to create (at least) an
illusion of being indispensable and needed, abandonment concerns
are averted. This behavior is driven by our subconscious determination
to maintain inequity in relationships, for the one who needs the
least is always the one in power.
Partners may unwittingly undermine
themselves by losing jobs, getting sick, injured, etc., to be complicit
with the dynamic you've needed to maintain in the relationship.
There's always a payoff in this--as the unspoken agreement
or 'contract' that was created when you two first joined remains
unchanged, and neither of you has to budge from your established
role, or comfort zone.
When a mate/partner is perceived
as diminished (or less than) you feel more secure, in that
you can control the relationship dynamic and manipulate its
emotional climate to suit internal comfort levels. In
truth, feeling needed is enhancing to
your self-image, and reinforces a sense of well-being/safety; but
if a lover gains some empowerment and develops a more equal
footing, your Caregiver prowess feels suddenly diluted. This is when
your emotional equilibrium is compromised and abandonment anxiety
surfaces, prompting either sabotaging or clinging behaviors. Selection
strategy generally insures against this outcome, as you will turn
away from lovers or friends who are capable of meeting you on a more
balanced playing field. Healthier choices require authentic
self-esteem, which you may never have had opportunity to develop.
You'll naturally guard against anybody discovering this secret, as
covert shame (a remnant from childhood) steers you away from more
viable, fully-integrated people who might notice your fragility
at the core of this issue?? Being
loved in totality is something that Caregivers do not fundamentally
believe is possible, as "negative" (or less appealing) traits
and feelings have been suppressed since infancy, in order to gain
more affection and care, and mitigate fears of abandonment. Essentially,
this child has been emotionally blackmailed into responding to the
needs of his/her mother, and personality aspects that were unpleasant
or inconvenient for her to accommodate,
are surrendered/discarded. Even if Mom just needed to shield her husband
from any form of agitation, her child is conditioned to believe that
specific facets and feelings are unacceptable and bad.
As he matures, he will internalize and adopt this attitude toward
himself; even the subtlest awareness of their presence makes
him think he's unlovable and "bad," so
he virtually amputates them out of his persona and becomes a People
Pleaser, which could have serious health repercussions.
problems, rheumatism, migraine headaches and Anxiety/Panic
Disorders are only a few of the ailments that are triggered by
long-held resentment and repressed rage. It's not that anger
is bad--but it's harshly self-judged, and banished from the personality
structure. This deficit in feelings/emotions results in a partial
personality, instead of a whole one.
Partial personalities are attracted
to dimensions/aspects in others, that are absent in themselves
(think of a jigsaw puzzle searching for its own missing pieces in
another, that houses a greater variety of shapes and colors), which
is key to why they attach themselves to lovers who possess
volatile, cruel or fragile personality facets. Their desire for a
sense of completeness prompts them to seek it within others--rather
than developing an autonomous, fully dimensional and actualized Self.
ONE MAN'S CEILING IS
ANOTHER MAN'S FLOOR.
Caregiver personalities learned
to mitigate their emotional pain in childhood, by noticing others
who were less fortunate. If they could observe another's far worse
plight, it affirmed (by contrast) that theirs wasn't so bad
after all--and it seemed more palatable. We've all grown up with platitudes;
"I cried when I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no
legs." You couldn't feel compassion for yourself,
because there was always somebody else who had it
a lot worse--and besides, "pity-parties" weren't allowed
in your home!
If our parents judged or invalidated
our pain, we learned to treat ourselves precisely the same way when
uncomfortable emotions emerged. Core shame is experienced by the child
whose anguish or emptiness is trivialized by a mom or dad who is disconnected
from his/her own feelings and needs. This parent treats the child's
feelings as bad or wrong, and admonishes him to "snap out of
it," while assuring that others are far less fortunate
than he, and he should be grateful for what he has! This kid will
grow up invalidating his own desires and needs, for it triggers core
There is no opportunity for
this child to receive an empathic response to his pain, nor grow up
with any capacity to respect his own feelings, and learn to self-soothe.
He becomes an empty, robotic shell of an adult, for this is who he
is schooled to become. His genuine feeling self is submerged/killed
When various feelings are disposed
of during childhood, our extra-sensory aspects (instinct and intuition)
can't function properly. This puts us at risk for professional and
personal setbacks, because rather than being able to rely on these
innate aspects (our built-in survival guide) to help us, we make choices
based on what we think is right, rather than sensing
what's going to serve us. This can leave us second-guessing important
Your instincts will never
lie to you. If you find it difficult to trust others, it's only because
you're disconnected from your feelings, and you don't trust your
senses to help you determine who you can trust, and who you
DEFENSES, DENIAL AND
DEATH OF THE REAL SELF.
false-self is grandiose, to compensate for its inherent vulnerability.
It's constructed from defenses and denial of true feelings, which
keeps the real Self protected. This mighty, invincible aspect
we construct early in life helps us surmount painful emotional deficits
in childhood--but when we're grown, there's a heavy price to pay for
maintaining it. We're afraid to let that mask drop, for fear we'll
be viewed as incidental/useless, and be rejected. We've learned that
our survival depends on being strong/indispensable, and there's
no room for 'weakness' of any kind--but to really love, means
to need (and allow for our vulnerable feelings within
a trusted, truly intimate connection).
Childhood coping strategies
taint our perceptions in adulthood. They have us feeling sorry for
another--even when they've caused us great harm.
The sympathetic feelings we give to somebody else are frequently triggered
by our own (discarded) sense of fragility that's projected
onto them! This reflex is automatic, if you've attached to a Borderline.
Rather than feeling your
anguish and licking fresh wounds, you will find ways to "forgive"
(but you're constantly obsessing,
and can't forget!). You'll make allowances/excuses for them--but
never yourself. Genuine empowerment has remained elusive, but your
self-protective, survival defenses remain intact.
THE BLIND LEADING THE
resolving core trauma gives birth to arrogance. It has us giving to
those who crave our attention, but don't actually want to get better.
Maybe you've provided a patient ear and offered sound support to a
friend over the course of months or years, but nothing ever changes
for him or her.
compulsions are usually heightened, with friends who have Borderline
Personality Disorder features. They'll complain about issues with
a spouse or lover, yet won't seek therapeutic help for those concerns.
Why should they? You're their enabler who loves being
needed, and keeping them as hapless and discontent as they are.
friends try to piggy-back onto your inner work. Therapy 'by
proxy' never helps someone. You are not equipped to assist them, even
if you feel you're making solid gains in treatment~ besides, this
is the blind leading the blind, for rather than enduring your own
difficult feelings, you're wanting to relieve another of theirs! This
just fortifies your addictions, and forestalls emotional expansion
great at fixing, rescuing, teaching and training, but authentic
intimacy/closeness is unsustainable and avoided, given their
abandonment concerns. Caregivers are often attracted to borderline
disordered individuals who match their own emotional deficits
and attachment fears.
Truly powerful individuals are
attracted to others like themselves. They don't prey on the weak or
needy, and they do not need to be needed.
ENMESHMENT MEANS, "WHERE
DO YOU END, AND I BEGIN?"
Caregivers can't allow others
to experience difficult feelings, because they're unable to honor
and hang out with their own. When a friend is sad, caregiver personalities
feel an irrepressible need to micro-manage/mitigate the other's emotions,
because permitting their own has always been too painful.
When you learn to tolerate your uncomfortable feelings,
you'll start letting others have theirs.
has developed an idealized notion of how he must be perceived
in order to be loved--so each giving gesture literally provides
a self-image payoff. While this emotional 'reward'
may be satisfying on some level, the compulsion to take care of others,
consistently overrides personal needs and underdeveloped
feelings, and perpetuates an issue of "Giving 'till
it hurts," because sensations of guilt
are experienced when he doesn't.
If you haven't come to fully
accept yourself with both light and dark facets and feelings,
how can you possibly like and respect yourself? This issue sets you
up for having to buy another's love
with gifts, gestures and behaviors that consistently place another's
desires and needs before your own. These actions are always
automatic/reflexive, because yours have never mattered, and
you haven't learned to discern--much less, sanction them.
The Pleaser so hungrily seeks
approval, he'll happily work longer hours, take on extra
tasks that aren't part of his job description, never take vacations,
never ask for a raise in salary, etc. He secretly wants his contributions
to be noticed and rewarded--but fear keeps him from asking
for any compensation. He would literally prefer that his employer
intuit his needs/desires and grant what's never spoken of
or requested--as deep down, he doesn't feel worthy
of receiving. This entitlement
issue generally begins during infancy, due to the lack of adequate
emotional bonding with our birth mother, and having no ability to
build a sense of trust that our basic needs can be met.
Unmet needs spawn painful, frustrating
sensations. It's natural for a child to decide that it's easier not
to have needs, than to keep feeling anguish from not having
his needs respected and honored. This difficulty gives rise to a sort
of emotional autism, and reinforces the non-needing, codependent self.
we've grown up making ourselves wrong for
having needs (one of the core tenets of codependency), it's easy to
feel like it's our fault, when we feel bad in a relationship
because we're not getting our needs responded to. This drives the
reflex to bury those needs, and make allowances/excuses for
others. It motivates the need to keep trying, in the face of any/all
obstacles and odds. This impulse comes from archaic sensations of
shame which are cemented by another's distorted
confirmation that we're defective/unlovable. Our subconscious mind
presumes that if we were truly lovable, we would get far more affection/attention,
and be happy and content: It never takes into account
the other's inability to love him/herself, or anyone else!
Lurking underneath the surface
of every Caregiver's attachments is often the question; "when's
it gonna be my turn?" They erroneously
presume that the more they give, the more they'll (eventually/some
day) get back--but that cannot happen, due to the type of
person they've chosen to love. Reciprocal relationships literally
feel uncomfortable, and are summarily avoided.
I once dated a guy who was the
quintessential codependent. I'm certain our relationship would have
fizzled rapidly, had I not been forced to move out of my home just
two weeks into our dance. I felt some depression about it, but he
was 'Johnny on the spot' working overtime, to keep me in his life
against my better judgment (I kept stating this wasn't a great time
for me to get involved). He was very helpful during those months,
but the instant I found a new abode and settled-in, he started acting-out
his abandonment fears by retreating sexually. So I was (finally) feeling
much lighter, and wanting him more than ever~ and he rejected
me (as he assumed I would him, once
I'd rebalanced, and he wasn't 'needed'). Poor
THE FEAR OF GOD FACTOR
Judeo-Christian principles have
fueled faulty beliefs about what constitutes "a good person."
We might be programmed from early in life, to accept that selflessly
doing for others will bring us happiness--but if that were so, why
would so many folks who subscribe to this ideation be suicidally depressed,
and staying in joyless, unproductive relationships? Should we turn
the other cheek, no matter how poorly someone treats us? Is this spirituality--or
just martyrdom and masochism?
If God needed you to be devoid of all "negative" emotions,
wouldn't he have created you without the ability to feel
While Buddhism promotes the
belief that 'chanting' will bring us everything we want, it takes
a dim view of emotions and actions that aren't considered congruent
with 'being in service' to another--once again, de-prioritizing
our feelings and needs, and putting them on the back-burner
to simmer, and rob energy from more productive pursuits! This nonsense
is underscored by fears of karmic retribution, if we entertain a retaliatory
or vengeful thought toward somebody who's intentionally done us wrong--and
suggests that we surely must have done something despicable in a past
life to have deserved these parents, siblings
or friends who've treated us abominably. Christ, no
wonder Buddha was fat! If our core belief
is that we don't deserve abundance and love, chanting
won't work, because shame and guilt from our childhood block us from
receiving! That's not Karma--it's just basic, metaphysical
and other twelve-step programs actually reinforce and perpetuate
addictions, by urging folks to "let go of their anger."
Transferring an addiction from one substance to another is common--because
12-Steps don't teach you to accept, honor and function
from all your emotions, rather than a select
few! Darker feelings and personality aspects are discarded, in order
to 'work the program.' Making amends is lovely--but when it comes
to apologizing to a parent or friend who's been neglectful or abusive,
aren't we seeking forgiveness for crimes we didn't commit?? How can
this help us--and doesn't it further our shame, if
we keep feeling bad in those relationships?
In my view,
the single most damaging element of Twelve-Step programs, is they
make you integrate the (faulty) belief that you're "powerless"
against your addiction (how could they keep you "coming
back" decade to decade if you believed full
recovery was an option?!). Powerlessness is something you had
to accept and adapt to as a small child--because there'd be hell to
pay, if you didn't! Dominating, ruthless parents can make a kid feel
helpless and hopeless, causing far too many child suicides, which
adult 'caregivers' prefer to call "accidents." If you credit
AA or NA with keeping you alive, that's fine, but does your notion
of really living mean thriving--or
merely surviving? You left home as a young adult to be autonomous
and in-charge of your own life. Have you accomplished this yet--or
are you still dependent on a system that constantly reiterates that
you can't make it on your own?? Does misery
love company--or is there some other payoff in this paradigm
that I'm missing?
Throwing the baby out with the
bathwater isn't what I'm proposing here, but we need to challenge
the merits of these ideologies with some independent, rational thinking--while
respecting their real reparative value for providing an anchor,
a support structure, and a sense of family and belonging
that many of us have (sadly) never known.
This 'sense of family' can also
catalyze detrimental consequences. It often has us
remaining in an abusive relationship or work environment, out
of an odd sense of loyalty--never realizing our need to flee
that toxic, excruciating situation. Having missed-out on any healthy
sense of 'acceptable' treatment in our childhood, this pain we're
tolerating simply feels normal to us.
I'm a proof's in the pudding
kind of person. If a behavior brings you glee and contentment, it's
worth maintaining. If it doesn't, you'd better ask yourself whether
it makes sense to keep doing the same thing over and over again, expecting
a different result! Fear is what keeps societies trapped in systems
that repeatedly fail them. These are promoted by people who've
needed to control you, not by God--who wants
for you, what you want for yourself.
have grown up under such stringent control by their parents, it's
impossible for them to have adopted alternate, loving/accepting ways
to treat themselves. Their 'critical inner parent' (Freud termed this
the Super-ego) is overdeveloped, they're constantly judging themselves,
and there's no inner peace if they can't perform "perfectly,"
according to the unreasonable standards they've set for themselves!
This element spawns self-loathing in individuals who have sadly fallen
prey to narcissistic and borderline features. The
Black Swan is a 2010 film that exemplifies pathological
is very common within this personality type, for there's substantial
difficulty with identifying feelings and needs. Having learned
to obliterate emotions in order to survive, recognizing and conveying
them in a straightforward manner is not only foreign, it involves
confronting long-dreaded vulnerability, and challenges/threatens one's
entrenched non-needing identity. Resentment is often
cumulative for someone who's unable to acknowledge feelings, and for
whom experiencing and expressing needs produces discomfort. Therefore,
a series of minor infractions that are usually unwitting on another's
part, are initially glossed over, and internalized as trivial or "unimportant."
Mounting resentment can easily erupt in explosive outbursts, but is
more often acted-out in a passive/non-direct
fashion, which can include physical, sexual or emotional withdrawal,
sarcasm, bitchiness, infidelities, delaying or "forgetting"
specific requests made by the lover, not following through with commitments,
etc. This style of interplay was learned by the (adult) child growing
up, as his parents were incapable of engaging him in healthier, more
constructive interactions. The outcome of this kind of parenting is
a deeply wounded self-esteem, and diminished sense of trust
in Self and others: We learn how to love ourselves
and others, by how we were treated as children.
SHOW ME WHERE YOU ARE,
AND I'LL KNOW WHERE YOU'VE BEEN.
Childhood experiences always
predict the nature of adult relationships. An extraordinary number
of males who've grown up without fathers or in homes where
the father was ill, abusive or just emotionally/physically unavailable,
have developed powerful inclinations to fix/rescue
females. When a mother's relationship with her spouse
or partner is lacking in emotional resources or she's unattached,
her children must often assume the complex (adult) role of filling
this void. While the eldest or male child is typically chosen for
this task, any child who's felt responsible for meeting his/her mother's
needs, will likely develop rescuing compulsions. These dynamics are
usually kept in place for the duration of one's life, or the life
of the mother (and beyond, if there are siblings for whom he or she
feels responsible). This enmeshment
issue acutely interferes with a Caregiver's ability to create an independent,
emotionally gratifying and successful lifestyle, without significant
feelings of remorse, shame or guilt over "inadequate" attention/support
to his parent or siblings, no matter how much has been given
Since these attitudes and behaviors
were essentially implanted during the earliest part of his formative
years, they tend to remain alive indefinitely. If specific therapeutic
help is not engaged to dismantle these constructs, they are projected
onto his romantic liaisons--which spawns significant emotional ambivalence.
Hence, a male who appears to "fear commitment" may actually
be trying to avoid engulfment, because he's
lacked a positive/sound frame of reference for what it means to experience
closeness (as a child, bonding meant bondage).
His twin fears; Abandonment
and Engulfment (or loss of Self), combine with difficult feelings
of inadequacy and unworthiness that catalyze destructive, compensatory
behaviors. Control issues and addictions help this Caregiver
defend against painful ambivalence that's characterized by deep
longing but fear of needing, and further undermine his
personal strivings and attachment endeavors. He (or she) might routinely
pursue relationships with borderline
disordered individuals, who are incapable of sustaining genuine
intimacy and connection; under these conditions of course,
the task of maintaining 'safe' emotional proximity becomes a non-issue.
Long-distance romances can also inhibit authentic affectional bonds,
and assuage one's engulfment
frequently construct and maintain fast-paced, highly stressful lifestyles,
to avoid difficult sensations (like emptiness, depression) that can
surface when they slow down enough to feel.
Busily responding to the needs and crises of others, reliably bolsters
a tenuous self-image that fits very neatly into this Avoidant Syndrome.
Fixing/rescuing behaviors help Caregivers side-step having to confront
personal issues and challenges, and distract from emotional
pain or dissatisfaction. This is a spectacular form of self-medication--but
relief is only temporary, which reinforces the addictive compulsion
to focus attention outside oneself, rather than looking within.
was once a child who required love and affection to mirror his intrinsic
value and self-worth. Since this was never properly reflected, he
has ingeniously invented various methods by which to gain
a sense of Self, by over-achieving, publicly performing, rescuing
or constantly responding to the needs of others. In essence, he's
been programmed to feel worthless, empty and invisible unless he's
actively doing, so the simple act of being
can invoke guilt and self-loathing. To avert these feelings, even
caregiving professionals are compelled by "fixer-uppers"
in romantic relationships, as well as needful, physically/emotionally
compromised friends who depend on them for support and refueling.
Healthy/whole people are drawn to balanced interpersonal
relationships--not codependent ones.
I had a close collegial friendship
for many years with a gal whose husband so frequently contracted the
Disease du Jour, she was utterly terrified every month or
so, that his demise could be imminent! Since this pattern existed
throughout the thirteen years we'd been friends, I couldn't help but
wonder what underlying issues perpetuated it. In short, what was the
subconscious payoff for his getting sick so often, or diagnosing
himself with each dreaded disease? I finally asked what changes
occurred in their day-to-day dynamic when hubby was supposedly critically
ill--and her reply was predictable; she
gave him a lot more attention
and tender concern! For a guy who'd grown up with
a mother who'd encouraged him to play in the streets, and
had little regard for his safety or well-being, I presumed this extra
attention from his overly-busy, psychotherapist wife felt pretty darned
good. As far as I know, they're still doing that dance--it's just
simple, emotional mathematics.
This same "friend"
would only return my calls, when she could discern I was
struggling--but I'd have to wait a week or two to hear back from her,
if I just wanted a simple, friendly exchange. She'd offer to take
me to non-emergent medical appointments (which felt infantalizing),
but we'd have to plan weeks in advance, for a social get-together.
It seemed as if friendship was foreign to her, if she couldn't be
in the control seat. Given that I only got attention when
I needed her, I often felt pathologized or less-than in our
relationship. Did I speak with her about these issues? Numerous
times--but nothing ever changed. I ultimately withdrew from this undersatisfying
THE DOOR TO WHOLENESS, BY HONORING EMPTINESS.
a child experiences aloneness, it hurts! He lacks a sense
of belonging, or feeling like he actually matters to anyone. These
difficult sensations feel like emptiness/deadness, which triggers
deep despair. Given these children assume it's their fault
for feeling this way, they attempt to be more useful, important and
other-oriented, to keep their dreaded deadness
away. This kid turns into an observer who's always
outside himself judging his every move, rather than living
inside himself and noticing, trusting and honoring his own
perceptions, feelings and senses.
Caregiver personalities are
'busy-bodies' who compulsively keep themselves running--despite
sensations of tiredness, sickness, injury, etc. If your entire sense
of identity is contingent on how well you take care of everybody else,
how is it ever possible to slow down, and respond to your
personal feelings and needs? Busy-bodies are typically unable to distinguish
between feelings and thoughts. These folks are accustomed to thinking
their way through life, as opposed to feeling their
way along. Instincts and intuitions are discarded along with other
vital sensations, that function as our inner compass or GPS. Their
absence can leave us shooting in the dark romantically, and settling
for harmful relationships, just to flee inner emptiness that feels
worse than most types of pain.
live with a powerful compulsion give what they never
received. There's a dire, inescapable need to take care of everyone
else in a manner that's completely foreign to their own childhood
experiences. They'll never fully relax for fear that they're not performing
perfectly, and have let someone/anyone down,
if they can't! These nagging sensations reinvigorate their disease
to please--and perpetuate controlling, codependent behaviors.
Selflessness is just a lofty word for codependency,
and it's dysfunctional.
When Caregivers construct elaborate
defenses like crisis/chaos addictions,
they're running from internal distress. Constantly responding to the
needs of others enables them to circumvent their own uncomfortable
feelings (anger, sadness, loneliness, deadness, etc.), and maintain
denial of deep, unhealed trauma. Descending into their personal
anguish within a therapeutic alliance is typically avoided, because
the notion of allowing a supportive, nourishing, ongoing relationship
(essential in helping them mend) feels threatening to their
non-needing or 'false-self.' Thus, even friendships and professional
or social connections that lack reciprocity
due to inherent limitations, are sub-consciously ratified and perpetuated.
Whether you're a therapist or patient: Feeling creates
opportunity and capacity for Healing.
HEAL THYSELF - THE WOUNDED PRACTITIONER
Individuals who've not addressed
core wounds (or narcissistic trauma) at the foundation of
this problem, may be especially attracted to careers involving psychological
or medical intervention. Psychotherapists, doctors and nurses are
all drawn to helping or "fixing" people, as this can form
the basis of their self-worth, and provide opportunities to 'change'
someone in ways that were never possible to accomplish with a parent.
Their appetite for omnipotence has germinated from
early childhood, and was originally born out of a need to construct
a more powerful (and sometimes grandiose) ego structure, to compensate
for archaic deficits that left them feeling disempowered/fragile.
The inner craving that stems
from this emotionally under-nourished period,
fuels addictions to alcohol/drugs, shopping, overeating,
over-work/exercise, scholastic or professional over-achievement, gambling,
sex, etc. Someone's drive to alter, elevate or numb his/her
mood with substances or compulsive behaviors, is a desperate attempt
to fill the core void. This void
or sense of emptiness, represents the most prominent
piece of every addict's fractured inner mosaic--and there's profound
terror in that space.
Caregivers are way too tough
on themselves due to self-loathing, which is a learned response
to abuse and/or neglect during childhood. Maybe they left home to
flee shaming criticisms--but continue beating-up on themselves
for failings or imperfections. It's imperative you
get help to change this!
is frighteningly common among helping professionals. Reluctant to
acknowledge or experience personal needs, even psychotherapists may
neglect to confront their own core disturbances, which leaves
them ill-suited to recognize and empathically respond to their patients'
most distressing feelings, struggles and self-sabotaging patterns--but
is it even possible to effectively walk someone else through a tunnel,
that you've been unable or unwilling to navigate?
clinicians are invested in keeping their patients or clients in treatment
far longer than necessary to fortify their own sense
of Self--and gratify an unquenchable need to feel needed. Sadly, one's
client base might even function as a sort of surrogate family
for the therapist who has yearned for, but lacked a meaningful
connection with his or her family of origin--which can extend your
caregivers are likely to have struggled with individuating from Mother
during early development. Not having made this crossing when it was
age appropriate to do so, has many of them feeling forever obligated
to take care of a parent's needs. Their clients may face a similar
struggle to move on from therapy, for it's
an abandonment trigger for the clinician who has unresolved issues
pertaining to their own disrupted attempts to separate in infancy.
In short, you may be discouraged from ever leaving them.
are treatment-resistant. Many have never
spent one hour on someone else's couch, and need to fuel their belief
that they've "got it all together," given their professional
accomplishments--but such is rarely true. I've observed a
great deal of borderline pathology, codependency
and other active
addictions in the psychotherapeutic community--and my sense is,
their grandiosity is simply a by-product of unresolved core issues.
When I was a
teen, my dad once said; "make sure you clean up the mess in your
own backyard, before you start on someone else's." This little
piece of wisdom has had me holding my feet to the fire, with respect
to healing and growth. Perhaps it can serve as a helpful reminder,
for you too. The truth is, we're not ready to take on passengers,
if we haven't plugged up the holes in our own boat. Many people lead
lives of quiet desperation, because they're drowning in an ocean of
unfinished business from their childhood, and have unwittingly chosen
mates who rip the scabs off old, unhealed injuries.
I've worked with many clients
over the years, who are core trauma survivors. Most have geographically
distanced themselves as far as possible from their parental home,
in order to establish a degree of emotional autonomy. Over time, the
issue of enmeshment (inability to discern and separate feelings,
belonging to either the parent or the Self) is resolved. At this juncture,
one's relationship endeavors can start to become more balanced, productive
and gratifying. One's mother figures most prominently within
this enmeshment scheme, as she is the first object of attachment,
and the mother/child bond is intricate and profound.
LOVE, TRUST, AND OTHER
A developing fetus hears and
learns his mother's voice and language style, co-experiences
her emotional states and forms an intimate bond with her in-utero.
This of course, has far reaching ramifications for children
given away at birth ('adoptees'), and imprints them with feelings
of abandonment, which are almost impossible to identify or articulate
without sensitive, specialized care. Pre-verbal sensations of guilt,
unworthiness and shame, which result from having been given up for
adoption or abandoned by a mother's untimely death (or emotional
withholding), make them feel "unwanted or discarded,"
and drive a deep need to avert this kind of trauma from ever
issues can inhibit connections that might become more than casual/superficial,
or cause one to maintain relationships that are unfulfilling
or abusive; under these conditions,
any connection could seem better than no connection at all.
Many of these folks compulsively strive for perfection in adulthood,
to ameliorate their ever-present terror of rejection, or being
Whether physical loss of the
mother constitutes part of this core deficit or not, enmeshment issues
stemming from emotional abandonment are easily implanted
during infancy and early childhood. Again,
when a woman's needs are not met by her spouse or partner, they're
transferred to her child, which fosters an unhealthy, fused/enmeshed
bonding that conditions him to feel responsible for her survival and
well being. If the child's attempts to form an autonomous
ego are thwarted when he begins to separate/individuate from
her in infancy, he remains fixated on the needs of his mother, and
on every attachment thereafter (to his detriment).
Very early on, he begins to sense that only a modicum of personal
need fulfillment is available to him, which impacts
his sense of worth and viability; in the process, he acquires a subtle
anxiety that cannot help but question, "if something should
happen to you, what will become of me?"
This deep concern prompts Herculean measures to rescue, fix/repair
or normalize his beloved parent and their interactions, to
mitigate his abandonment fears. At his own expense, he'll even
adopt the mother's depressive or dysfunctional features, to retain
some semblance of connection with her. These rescuing impulses are
automatically carried into his adult dynamics, and are the root
of codependent relationships.
As previously stated, the basis
of this disturbance is intricate, and begins very early. When separation
is attempted by an infant with a core-damaged mother, this necessary
aspect of his development virtually reactivates the mother's
original abandonment trauma (carried over from her infancy),
and re-awakens insidious primal rage that's projected
onto her child. Prior to his individuation phase, this infant's mother
might have started experiencing a sense of wholeness, connection and
purpose she's never known before, and these richly pleasurable sensations
fostered desperate measures to remain attached. Henceforth, the consistent,
underlying message in her tone, facial expressions and behaviors toward
him throughout this period could convey; "don't
you dare separate and cease existing for me and my
needs, or I will abandon/annihilate you." This would
echo her own disrupted efforts to retain affection and approval, while
attempting to forge an autonomous, healthy Ego, distinctly separate/apart
from her mother. Core emptiness can drive a woman's psychic/emotional
need to give birth to a lot of babies in very close succession;
think of Nadya Sulemon (The Octomom), for she thrives on their dependency.
A Borderline mother may physically harm her children
or make them sick in order to keep them dependent, as with
Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy--or murder them, as they develop beyond
this stage. In either case, this child's spirit is
killed off, which spawns a sense of despair and deadness/emptiness
that (without core
trauma recovery) can last an entire lifetime.
primal needs (from infancy) will always
take precedence over adult needs! Comforting/soothing physical connection
and touching can trap people in frustrating relational dynamics that
are lacking in emotional, cerebral, spiritual and financial need satisfaction.
Females often fall prey to relationships with males they think
have "potential," only to be disappointed when their practical
adult needs aren't responded to. They remain angry or dissatisfied--yet
are unable to leave, if their little girl needs for comfort
are being met. At the heart of this issue is enmeshment--and
grown woman needs are typically forfeited, within
this (lack of Self) paradigm.
enmeshment issues are especially common among men who attach to Borderline
women. A Borderline's clinginess and neediness can feel suffocating
and engulfing, but may replicate an adult male's earliest
bonding experiences with Mother. This imprint is potent/heady, and
is often retained as a sense memory; the way she smells,
the nature of her touch or sound of her voice, makes him think that
he's unwittingly found what he's needed his whole
life! The loss of this type of attachment will send a man
into perilous pain and longing, which is
unmatched by any other (remembered) life event.
It should be noted, that if
a nourishing symbiosis
with Mother isn't possible during infancy, and a far more attentive/loving
attachment is forged with the father, an emotionally sound adult may
eventually emerge. But if the father leaves
through divorce, death or remarriage, the abandonment trauma
this invokes will significantly impact all future relationships. Anxiety
surrounding potential loss of someone who might have substantial
meaning and value, can inhibit or destroy healthy, gratifying adult
connections--and exacerbate personality disorder features.
LOVE HAS BECOME ENTWINED WITH PAIN
The cost of not resolving core
wounds is reflected in every decision and life choice we make professionally
and personally, and crucially impacts romantic endeavors. A caring,
mutually nurturing and enhancing relational
experience is completely foreign to most Caregivers. They've seldom
(if ever) received affection, support and positive mirroring from
a non-abandoning source, nor have they experienced loving,
that's unaccompanied by pain. The Caregiver
repeatedly welcomes relationships that activate dramatic/painful sensations
associated with early attachment difficulties, while routinely rejecting
those who are actually equipped to meet his/her needs. There's little
capacity to respond passionately to a healthy/rewarding dynamic,
because the familiar ache of intense longing and yearning--which has
come to be interpreted as
"Love," isn't present with an available
partner! One's perception of such a relationship is that "something's
missing," as it cannot trigger feelings that parallel
his disappointing/unrequited attachment experiences in childhood.
A lover who's elusive, cruel,
or just emotionally and/or physically unavailable can trigger painful
sensations that replicate what the Caregiver experienced
as a child, seeking a loving/responsive parent. This emotionally inadequate,
yet dramatically felt kind of episode functions as a powerful catalyst,
that inspires a tenacious (and vaguely familiar) pursuit to seduce
the object of desire into returning his attention and ardor. Since
the intense feelings that are invoked by such a relationship
are compelling/addictive, any individual who awakens
them, is addictive as well. In the rare event an attachment is
successfully formed, rejection by the lover can set in motion
an internal re-creation of his earliest abandonment experience, and
drudge up excruciating feelings of inadequacy and shame, which are
almost impossible to tolerate. Punishment of the Self (compulsive,
addictive reflexes or destructive acting-out behavior) usually accompanies
or follows this kind of upset.
Perhaps the most tragic part
of this issue, is that a core-wounded individual unwittingly
seeks lovers who are no more equipped to respond to her needs, than
her unavailable parent was! She continues to embrace the
notion that she will one day find someone who excites her, and whom
she can train or teach to love her in ways she's always wanted--but
this is a child's fantasy that will never be realized. Still, if these
inexhaustible efforts should yield even marginal success, she could
feel encouraged to remain, and continue striving for that which cannot
It's very important to realize,
that if a lover could become responsive to his partner's
needs, he'd be discarded because of other perceived shortcomings or
"flaws" that would suddenly seem untenable; again, an available
lover doesn't provoke an intense visceral response. In truth, the
thrill is in pursuit and seduction, which perpetuates an endless
re-enactment of a child's most fervent wish for a closer bond with
his/her parent, while defending against a more palpable fear of losing
a deeply meaningful and nourishing attachment. This often means, that
individuals who are actually capable of loving/caring interactions
are distanced, punished or rejected, so that anxiety surrounding devastating
abandonment, is kept at bay. This
is the Borderline's crucible.
The narcissistically injured
Caregiver may repeatedly convince herself that she is capable
of intimacy, by practicing relationship skills with partners who are
incapable of fully responding to her. Thus,
she continues to refuel the notion that she is "available"
by taking calculated emotional risks--the rewards of which, are false
reflections of her actual capacity to bond. I'm reminded
of a woman who periodically resuscitated discarded relationships.
During episodes of re-engagement, she was utterly convinced she loved
and wanted these men, but always admitted that if the current lover
pursued commitment, she'd beat a hasty retreat--and
enumerated his "deficits" to reinforce her stance. When
one of these former boyfriends eventually gained closure and attached
to another, this gal succumbed to a severe depression. Unable to reseduce
this man, she appeared to re-experience her childhood abandonment
despair, in having to surrender this intensely felt, yet under-satisfying
connection. My sense was that profound (core) sensations of loss,
shame and unworthiness, paralleled acute, long-denied pain from unhealed
trauma can create a virtual minefield, in context
of romantic endeavors. Sadly, the partner of an abandoned (adult)
child cannot help but step on emotional land mines that have lain
dormant, perhaps for decades. Self-esteem injuries that have existed
since the primal rejection experience are reactivated--which
triggers intense anguish and rage. It is this
mechanism which elicits volatile/violent reactivity from BPD individuals.
As this early
painful material isn't usually held on a conscious level (in terms
of its impact), repercussions from a lover's unwitting slights
are very difficult to recover from, and often bring about a couple's
Many of us grew up observing
our parents doing battle, and as children learn from example, this
became our definition for what 'marriage' meant. If we're
somehow lucky enough to have found a copasetic, nourishing relationship,
we might need to upset that balance, just to feel like things are
normal. In short, we've gotta throw a monkey wrench
into the works, because harmony and peace feel foreign--and therefore,
uncomfortable. We could even have become somewhat like the
parent we most feared or hated.
CAN'T BUILD YOUR CASTLE ON A CRUMBLING FOUNDATION, AND EXPECT IT TO
critical to understand, is that many of us lacked a healthy/consistent
bond during infancy with our mothers. As a result,
our search for 'perfect attunement' with romantic partners
(for which we have no suitable frame of reference) can easily
continue indefinitely. The compelling drive to manufacture this nourishing/satisfying
primal experience (and heal), propels us toward intense, unstable
relationships that echo familiar, but defective interpersonal styles
that were imprinted throughout infancy and childhood. Stated more
simply, our model for meaningful adult attachments
has been constructed from a relationship blueprint, which consisted
of painful, under-nourishing experiences! This early blueprint continues
to influence self-worth and partner selection, unless/until
a solid, nurturing therapeutic alliance can provide a sturdier
foundation built on supportive, empathic interactions.
Emotionally sound, available
people do not choose lovers who aren't.
The person you choose to love
and partner with, mirrors your own level
of emotional development. If you are truly seeking an authentic and
intimate relationship, you won't attach to or remain with
someone who's not, because he/she isn't a 'match' for your fundamental
needs and desires. If you think there's a pattern in your
romantic life that consistently feels disappointing, lacking and/or
painful, you might ask yourself why you're attracted to this type
of individual. More importantly, try to discern the feelings or fears
that emerge, when you contemplate deeply loving someone,
who could actually respond to you the way you've always wanted,
and needed to
This is my keystone piece, from
which nearly all other material on this site emanates. It was originally
conceived and written for psychotherapists. More on core injury can
be found in other Articles
and various Forum
discussions. Archived questions/answers relating specifically to these
concerns, are in my Codependency Forum.
If you're a practitioner who wants to integrate healing work
into your practice, private guidance is available.
you are seeking help with these issues, or your group/organization
would like me to speak on this topic, feel free to contact
me. The following forum letter should provide further insight about
Q. Your article hit home for me,
and I was amazed at the profound power of knowledge. But how do you
change all those "familiar" patterns, and stop rejecting
good people who could be loving/giving to you? What is the recovery
or hope of changing all that early programming, as who had a chance
when they were an infant?
Trust is (ideally) established in the first year of life with our
mothers. As an infant, you may have begun sensing
you couldn't depend on her to respond sufficiently
to your needs, and started moving toward emotional self-reliance in
order to survive. This has served you in some ways, but not in others,
as it's kept you from getting help with
forming healthier, more gratifying attachments! Effective therapeutic
support assists you in healing early deficits, by providing corrective
emotional experiences that are qualitatively different than what you've
been exposed to in your past. These therapeutic opportunities allow
you to receive nurturing, attentive (re)parenting, and assist you
in feeling more worthy (and desirous) of nourishing, loving experiences
within your interpersonal world. Early emotional trauma can be overcome
with the help of a professional who understands how profoundly these
wounds have affected you, and hindered your capacity to accept and
trust an ongoing, nurturing,
supportive relationship. Most 'therapy' doesn't tap into this material.
Seek help from someone who's well-versed in treating narcissistic
injury (or core issues). Additional insights can be gained via the
writings of Alice Miller; search for this author
you have an iPhone, iPad or iPod this app will let you hear
here, to determine if you're in an abusive relationship!
'TILL DEATH DO US PART - BPD and The Marriage Crucible
TO BE A GOOD-ENOUGH PARENT
GOOD WIFE - Who's helping You, when his Ex is a Borderline?
WE MET BEFORE? The Borderline/Narcissist Couple.
The Drama of the Gifted
Child, by Alice Miller (and/or any other books from
"I Don't Want to Talk
About It": Overcoming the Secret Legacy of Male
Depression, by Terrance Real.
by David Schnarch, Ph.D.
Shari and Get Session Details
PsychSavant at Twitter.com
Copyright © 2004 -
2013, Shari Schreiber, M.A. All Rights Reserved.